Texas A&M University System

Nominee's Name: *

Nominator's Name: *

Nominee's Title: *

Nominators Title: *

Nominee's Department: *

Nominators Department: *

Nominee's Supervisor:

Nominator's Email: **

Nominee's Years of SAGO Service:

Nominator's Signature (if not completed online):

This nomination will remain active for consideration for two EOQ award cycles.
For each eligibility and selection criteria, chose a ranking that best describes the individual. Written comments would be helpful to determine the winner in the event that two or more individuals receive the same total ranking marks. For each characteristic, please select a ranking that best suits that individual. The ranking scale is as follows:

1. - Superior Performance (consistently performs duties to the highest ability)
2. - Excellent Performance (performs duties above expectations)
3. - Average Performance (performs duties as expected)

Leadership: (Sets appropriate goals for self, coworkers/staff)
Note: Since the text cannot be saved until you submit the entire Nomination form, it is strongly recommended that you complete your responses in Microsoft Word, first, and then copy/paste the text into this form. Save your work often in Word.

Leadership Ranking: 1 2 3

Additional comments on Leadership:

Work Relationship: (promotes team efforts, interacts well with coworkers/others)

Work Relationship Ranking: 1 2 3

Additional comments on Work Relationship:

Achievement of Objectives: (helps fulfill SAGO's mission, achieves their objectives and/or objectives of their department)

Objectives Ranking: 1 2 3

Additional comments on Achievement of Objectives:

Service/Customer Relations: (committee work, customer service/relations both internal and external, and volunteer and/or community service)

Service Ranking: 1 2 3

Additional comments on Service/Customer Relations:

Performance: (strives for highest quality of work, promotes excellence and diversity)

Performance Ranking: 1 2 3

Additional comments on Performance: